Susan Victor

Security Controls Validation: The Critical Difference Between Protection and Vulnerability Cybersecurity teams face a critical challenge: ensuring their security controls actually work when attacked. Many organisations implement extensive security measures but fail to validate their effectiveness before a real attack occurs. This oversight creates a dangerous false sense of security. Security controls validation isn't just

Security Posture Validation: Strengthening Defences Against Modern Cyber Threats In a rapidly evolving threat landscape, organisations face increasing pressure to demonstrate the effectiveness of their security controls. As attacks grow more sophisticated and regulatory requirements tighten, traditional approaches to security testing no longer provide adequate assurance. Security posture validation offers a more robust, ongoing approach

The Evolution of Security: Moving Beyond Periodic Assessments The time between testing and an actual attack provides ample opportunity for vulnerabilities to emerge. Continuous security posture validation changes this paradigm, offering organisations ongoing visibility into their defensive capabilities. Rather than wondering if your systems are secure, this approach provides concrete evidence of your preparedness against

Cybersecurity's Critical Question: Do Your Controls Actually Work? In our ever-evolving cybersecurity landscape, organisations face a critical question: How do they truly know if their security controls work? While traditional risk assessments have been the standard evaluation method, sophisticated threats have introduced a more active methodology: security posture validation. Understanding the difference between these approaches

Security Posture Validation: A Business Leader's Guide In recent years, cybersecurity has evolved from an IT concern to a critical business priority. For non-technical leaders, understanding your organisation's security posture may seem daunting. Yet, with increasing regulatory requirements and sophisticated threats, having clarity on your systems' protection is essential. Security posture validation provides a clear

Understanding and Improving Your Cybersecurity Posture With ransomware attacks and data breaches happening daily, simply implementing security controls isn't enough—you need to know if they actually work. Understanding and improving your security posture is essential for creating cyber resilience against sophisticated attacks and meeting regulatory requirements. This article explores practical approaches to measuring your organisation's

Cyber Resilience in the Modern Threat Landscape Organisations need more than just conventional security measures—they need resilience. As cyber threats grow in sophistication, simply detecting attacks isn't enough; businesses must demonstrate their ability to withstand, adapt to, and recover from security incidents. This shift has made measuring and monitoring cyber resilience over time not just

Building an Effective Cyber Resilience Strategy In the modern day, having a cyber resilience strategy isn't just good practice—it's essential for survival. Organisations face increasingly sophisticated attacks while navigating complex regulatory requirements and limited security budgets. The difference between organisations that withstand attacks and those that suffer devastating breaches often comes down to their approach

Navigating the Cyber Resilience Imperative In a digital economy where cyber threats continue to grow in both frequency and sophistication, organisations can no longer rely solely on preventative security measures. Modern businesses need to develop capabilities that allow them to withstand attacks, maintain operations during incidents, and recover quickly from disruptions. This shift in mindset

Internal Risk Posture Assessment: The Foundation of Modern Cybersecurity Understanding your organisation's internal risk posture is fundamental to creating an effective cybersecurity strategy. By focusing on internal vulnerabilities alongside external threats, you gain a more comprehensive defence posture. Internal risk assessments identify excessive privileges, misconfigurations, and security gaps often overlooked Traditional approaches frequently miss internal